- 0 minutes to read

Apache Camel, Logging, FAQ, Splunk Alternative, ELK Alternative, Cost Comparison Apache Camel, Splunk, ELK, Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana, cost comparison, 80-85% savings, ingestion volume, flat fee licensing, SQL Server storage, Message Types, Search Fields, BPM, integration logging Nodinite vs Splunk/ELK cost comparison for Apache Camel logging. Typical savings: 80-85% ($24K/year Splunk vs $2.6K/year Nodinite). Flat fee licensing with unlimited volume vs ingestion-based pricing. Purpose-built for integration logging.

How does Nodinite compare to Splunk/ELK for Apache Camel?

How does Nodinite compare to Splunk/ELK for Apache Camel logging costs?

Typical savings: 80-85%. Splunk charges by ingestion volume (GB/day). ELK requires infrastructure management (Elasticsearch clusters, Logstash pipelines, Kibana). Nodinite charges per-environment flat fee ($150-300/month) with unlimited log volume.

Example: 12 Apache Camel apps generating 8GB/day logs = $24,000/year Splunk. Same workload on Nodinite: $1,800/year licenses + $800/year SQL Server storage = $2,600/year (89% savings).

Trade-off: Nodinite is purpose-built for integration/middleware logging with business-oriented features ([Message Types][], [Search Fields][], [BPM][]). Splunk is general-purpose log aggregation for any log type (application logs, security logs, infrastructure logs). Choose Nodinite if 80%+ of your logs are integration transactions.

See all FAQs: [Troubleshooting Overview][]